Vito OM646, 2009
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2026 12:26 pm
Hello everyone,
The Vito 646 engine belongs to a buddy of mine. Donkey years have never failed him. Up until it abruptly stopped working last week. Just died. No beeps, no power outages, nothing. The low fuel pressure was fine, but the high fuel pressure reading was blank, and the crank sensor code was 2045-001. Furthermore, EGR code 2527-004.
I reverse-probed the engine ECU's pins 53 and 77.No reading was found; 750–1200 Ohms would be my expectation. I had the dreaded task of replacing the crank sensor. In any case, unchanged! After verifying the two wires' continuity, I found that the connection between the sensor's pin 2 and the ECU's pin 53 was tight, but the connection between the sensor's pin 1 and pin 77 was open. Accessing the wiring loom is a major hassle. I was hoping to hear from someone who has been in a similar position before I begin opening the loom. Given the similarities in design, it could have been an automobile.
I'm thinking that maybe the best course of action would be to run two additional wires to the sensor. However, similar to CAN wiring, the wires are "twisted" to further complicate matters.
I would greatly appreciate any recommendations.
TIA
The Vito 646 engine belongs to a buddy of mine. Donkey years have never failed him. Up until it abruptly stopped working last week. Just died. No beeps, no power outages, nothing. The low fuel pressure was fine, but the high fuel pressure reading was blank, and the crank sensor code was 2045-001. Furthermore, EGR code 2527-004.
I reverse-probed the engine ECU's pins 53 and 77.No reading was found; 750–1200 Ohms would be my expectation. I had the dreaded task of replacing the crank sensor. In any case, unchanged! After verifying the two wires' continuity, I found that the connection between the sensor's pin 2 and the ECU's pin 53 was tight, but the connection between the sensor's pin 1 and pin 77 was open. Accessing the wiring loom is a major hassle. I was hoping to hear from someone who has been in a similar position before I begin opening the loom. Given the similarities in design, it could have been an automobile.
I'm thinking that maybe the best course of action would be to run two additional wires to the sensor. However, similar to CAN wiring, the wires are "twisted" to further complicate matters.
I would greatly appreciate any recommendations.
TIA